bot313 / DOVER DEMON
00:00:00

DOVER DEMON

Illustration A thin big-headed creature with glowing eyes on a stone wall at night. Illustration.

A thin big-headed creature with glowing eyes on a stone wall at night.
Illustration, not a period photograph.

Folder
Cryptids
Status
UNRESOLVED Evidence 5/9
Where
42°14'46 N 071°16'59 W

Archive / Cryptid / BOT313-0029

CRY-197722 APR 1977CryptidACTIVE ARCHIVAL

WATERMELON-HEAD FIGURE IN DOVER, MASSACHUSETTS

Coords 42°14'46 N 071°16'59 W Witnesses 2Instruments 1Paper 2Evidence 5/9 SOLID

Fig. 01 A thin big-headed creature with glowing eyes on a stone wall at night. Illustration, not a period photograph.

Opening

On the night of 21 April 1977 a seventeen-year-old named Bill Bartlett drove down Farm Street in Dover, Massachusetts, and said a figure sat on a stone wall in his headlights. Watermelon head, no nose or mouth he could name, thin limbs, orange eyes. The two friends in the car were looking the other way. Two hours later John Baxter, walking Miller Hill Road, said he met a silhouette that ran to a tree and showed the same head. The next night Abby Brabham, in a car on Springdale Avenue, said she saw it crouched in the road.

Three teenagers, three sketches, a little more than two miles of road when you plot the points. The name Dover Demon is newspaper language from May, when the story left the town. None of them reported a craft. Investigators still filed it next to entity cases because the head would not sit on a dog.

Timeline

21 April 1977, about 22:30Bartlett in a Volkswagen on Farm Street. He takes the wall-shape for a cat or dog until the head is wrong. Peach or near-white skin, long fingers on the stones. He is shaken. They turn around. The wall is empty.

Later that nightBaxter walking home. A figure coming toward him, then off the road. He gets a look at a long-fingered thing holding a tree. The head in his sketch is the same family as Bartlett's.

22 AprilBrabham and Will Taintor in a car on Springdale. A short crouch in the road, tan, hairless, watermelon skull. Taintor gets less of it. That is the last claimed sighting.

Early MayLocal press and then investigators. Bartlett writes under his drawing that he swears he saw it. MUFON and others take statements. No adult driver adds a fourth independent visual from those two nights. No body is found in the woods.

Key figures

Bill Bartlett is the first pair of eyes and the best-known sketch. He is seventeen and later an artist. The 1977 drawing is the exhibit. Later interviews lengthen the second.

John Baxter and Abby Brabham are the other two nights. They do not share a car with Bartlett. That separation is why the cluster is not a single prank in one vehicle. It is still three teenagers in one town in one day.

The friends who did not look are useful negative witnesses. They were there and they missed it. That is allowed. It also means the first sighting is one pair of eyes.

Walter Webb and other 1977 investigators own the early write-up. Later skeptical identifications, including a newborn livestock animal, are later life unless they produce a 1977 photograph of that animal on Farm Street.

Physical and documentary trail

What exists:

One: Bartlett's sighting and sketch from Farm Street, with the sworn line under the drawing.

Two: Baxter's Miller Hill encounter and sketch, same night, different road.

Three: Brabham's Springdale sighting the next night, third road, same head family.

Four: the May 1977 local press and investigator notes that plot the three spots on a short line across Dover. No police recovery. No plaster cast. No photograph of the figure.

There is no adult corroboration from those hours. There is no track the town kept. There is no craft report attached to the wall.

I, Bill Bartlett, swear on a stack of Bibles that I saw this creature.

Bill Bartlett, written under his 1977 sketch of the Farm Street figure

Things you might not know

  • It was about four feet tall. That was Bartlett's estimate of the figure on the wall.
  • The police called it a holiday hoax. Dover police told the Associated Press the descriptions were probably nothing more than a school vacation hoax.
  • It was compared to Kelly-Hopkinsville. The cryptozoologist Loren Coleman said in 1977 that the creature resembled the small beings of the 1955 Kentucky encounter.
  • The film theory has a timing problem. Ben Radford suggested 1977 pop culture shaped the sightings, but Brian Dunning pointed out that Close Encounters of the Third Kind came out eight months after them.
  • A moose calf has been suggested. A newborn moose or foal in the headlights is one of the ordinary animals offered to explain the large head and thin legs.
  • Television dramatised it in 2009. Animal Planet's Lost Tapes made an episode about it.

Competing explanations

Unknown biped. This reading takes three sketches in twenty-four hours as one animal the woods have not given back. It has drawings and no hide.

Misidentified animal. A foal, a thin dog, a macaque story, a wet calf in headlights. Each of those has been offered. Each has to live with a watermelon head and no muzzle on three separate roads.

Shared invention. One drawing shown around a high school, two more sketches after. The friends who saw nothing in Bartlett's car cut against a group performance. They do not cut against a story that travelled overnight.

Later life of the case

The Dover Demon left town in May 1977 and never shrank back to local news. It became a fixture of New England folklore and of cryptid books, nearly always printed with Bartlett's sketch, and sceptics have since offered a young animal caught in headlights as the answer. No fourth witness has come forward from those two nights. For another small-town figure seen by a handful of people over a single night, see Flatwoods.

Finding

Bill Bartlett saw a watermelon head on a Farm Street wall, John Baxter met the same family of figure on Miller Hill, and Abby Brabham saw it crouched in the Springdale road. Three teenagers, three sketches, one day. Bartlett swore under the drawing because he knew how it would sound, and he drew it anyway.

What still will not resolve: a photograph, a cast of those long fingers on the stones, or an adult who stopped the car and saw the same head. Without one of those, Dover has three honest pages and no hide.

Evidence signature

5/9 Solid

Witnesses
several people
Instruments
photo, film or physical traces
Paper
official records at the time

How well documented the case is, not whether it's true. A strong record can still have an ordinary answer, and a thin one can still be real.

You decide · DOVER DEMON

What do you think happened?

One vote per case, anonymous. You'll see how other readers voted once you've voted.

Next file

See also

← BACK ← Cryptids ← HOME